The IHR (2005) is an international agreement between 194 States Parties and the World Health Organization for surveillance, reporting and response to events that may pose a threat to international public health. The objective of the IHR (2005) is to prevent, protect, control, control and respond to the international spread of diseases in a manner that is appropriate and limited to risks to public health and to avoid unnecessary interference with international traffic and trade. (International Health Regulations, Article 2). More information can be found in the IHR factsheets. In the United States, the term « treaty » has a different and more limited legal meaning than in international law. The U.S. law distinguishes what it calls « treaties » from « executive agreements, » which are either « congressional-executive agreements » or « exclusive executive agreements. » The classes are all equal international treaties; they differ only in the domestic law of the United States. The separation between the two is often unclear and is often politicized by disagreements within a government over a treaty, as a non-self-executing treaty cannot be implemented without the appropriate amendment of national legislation. If a treaty requires implementing laws, a State cannot fulfil its obligations by failing to adopt the necessary national laws. In international law, a treaty is any legally binding agreement between states (countries). A treaty can be called a convention, protocol, pact, agreement, etc.c is the content of the agreement, not its name, that makes it a treaty. Thus, both the Geneva Protocol and the Biological Weapons Convention are treaties, although neither has the word « treaty » in its name. Under U.S.

law, a treaty is specifically a legally binding agreement between countries that requires ratification and « deliberation and approval » by the Senate. All other agreements (treaties in the international sense) are called executive agreements, but are nevertheless legally binding on the United States under international law. International treaties are the most common means of creating international rules or norms to which States and other actors in the international community should adhere. Their importance has increased considerably in the context of modern international law. The quality of the application of international law has often been called into question, which has been regulated by the increasing treaty-making process. In addition, the universality of human rights can be considered an achievement through international treaties. International law holds that nothing can be done without or against the will of a sovereign State. International law in this sense can also be described as a meeting place for the need to make international commitments.

The present paper therefore fundamentally examines the characteristics and significance of international treaties from the point of view of international law. In addition, it was stated that the issue of reservations in the treaty process was becoming less and less important because it isolated the State from the world stage. In India, the subjects are divided into three lists: Union, State and at the same time. In the normal legislative process, matters on the trade union list must be regulated by law by the Indian Parliament. For the subjects on the Ls list, only the L.-P. legislature may legislate. .