In 1951, a reciprocity agreement was reached by the United States and the Philippines.102 The treaty publicly declares « their sense of unity and common determination to defend themselves against external armed attacks, so that no potential aggressor can deny the illusion that one of them is alone in the Pacific region. 103 The contract does not deal with a sofa or does not provide for it. In support of U.S. foreign policy, the United States has agreements with foreign countries on security and insurance obligations36. These agreements can be concluded in various forms, including in the form of a collective defence treaty (requiring the parties to the agreement to assist in the defence of a party to the agreement in the event of an attack), an agreement that contains a request for consultation (a party to the agreement requires action if the other parties to the agreement are threatened in the event of an attack on the security of the country. , an agreement that granted the right to military intervention (which gave one party the right to intervene, but not the duty to intervene militarily on the territory of another party to defend it against internal or external threats) or any other non-binding agreement (unilateral commitment or political declaration). CANPAÉs are often included as part of a comprehensive security agreement with other types of military agreements (such as the base. B, access and prepositioning). A SOFA may be based on the authority that has been found in previous contracts, convention measures or exclusive executive agreements that include the security agreement. The Status of the Armed Forces Agreement (PfP) is a multilateral agreement between NATO member countries and PfP countries. It deals with the status of foreign forces while it exists on the territory of another state. The diagrams below contain a list of current agreements based on the underlying source of authority, if any, for each OF the CANAPES.
In each category, agreements are categorized by partner country in alphabetical order. The categories are defined as follows: The United States entered into SOFA with Australia and the Philippines after the conclusion of contracts with the countries concerned. In the case of Australia, the U.S. Senate recommended ratification of the DEINS136 pact in 1952. In 1963, nine years after the ratification of the pact, Australia and the United States reached an agreement on the status of U.S. forces in Australia.137 The United States signed a SOFA with the Philippines in 1993, after concluding a mutual defence treaty with the country in 1952.138 Agreements with Australia and the Philippines thus differ from agreements with Japan and Korea. they invoke the general obligations arising from the previously concluded contract. , while the agreements with Japan and Korea refer to a specific authority (Articles VI and V respectively) in the underlying treaty. The United States has SOFAs whose authority underpinning the agreement is a treaty ratified by the United States.